![]() ![]() ![]() Those companies are looking out for their own bottom line!Įven if security were better from the outside world, I still don't trust inside the companies. They buy into this false sense of security that someone else is "looking out for" and "keeping safe" their file, pictures, or whatever. The public, cloud-based storage solutions have been heralded as so safe and many buy into that farce. The keys used to encrypt and decrypt the data are derived when the user logs in via their master password and/or biometrics. In Keeper's cloud file storage, data is encrypted and decrypted ONLY on the client device. Keeper is a zero-knowledge cloud storage provider and is not affected. This token is stored on each of the devices a user connects to their cloud storage device, and even if encrypted, it can be broken into and stolen by attackers. MITC attacks don't rely on vulnerabilities in the syncing applications themselves, nor on security holes in the cloud storage server, but act on a design flaw.īecause of the way these services were built, not requiring a password every time a file is synced, a token is used instead to authorize these operations without constantly hampering the user. The research paper details a new technique called MITC (Man in the Cloud), which allows attackers to intrude popular cloud storage services like Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. ![]() A report by Imperva shows how an attacker could easily get their grubby hands on cloud storage and synchronization accounts, without even needing the user's password, and use them in their illicit activities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |